Thursday, 29 December 2011

Defining what african literature means

          As specific and simplistic the terminology sounds, defining African literature in a holistic and encompassing manner has never been an easy feat. Different writers have given philosophical, cultural and literary jabs to the term in a bid to formulate an acceptable definition. However in an attempt to do this, most suggestions it seems are tilting towards a dangerous edge. Most definitions of African literature depict suffering, gloom, wars, conflicts and negativities which have become synonymous to the continent.                                   These derogatory attributes are being celebrated and institutionalized as exemplified in the number of gory tales about the continent that have gone on to win awards. Such definitions have confined the conceptualization of African literature to derogatory parameters.
        Hardly does this come as a surprise. Indeed defining Africa or identifying an African is even more of an ambiguous task. The modern day African struggles with self-determination and identity clashes. The pot-purri of foreign cultures, values, and beliefs has created a cultural gap in the psyche of the African. If one was asked to identify an African, would it mean someone who is a native of the continent? Would it include the North Africans who are of Arab descent? What about the blacks in Diaspora such as the South Americans, black Americans and other blacks scattered across the globe? These Ambiguities and intellectual disputations have reflected in the term African literature.
         So if we were to formulate a definition for African literature, what would it be? Would it also accommodate literature about the continent but written by foreigners? Why is it difficult to ascertain the writings from the North African countries as African literature? Would do you classify a text that is written in foreign languages of English and French as African literature?
        Defining the term has only thrown up more questions than answers. African writers themselves seem to be lost in this quagmire. The literary works of Africans have shown that we are still struggling to define ourselves. There is so much cultural pollution. An African in diaspora would certainly reflect western values in his works, perhaps more vividly than those of his roots/
     Perhaps the most disturbing trend as pointed out earlier is the uni-directional approach at clarifying this concept. Tales of war, child soldiers, kidnappings, corruptions, widowhood are shaping the definition of African literature. African writers with foreign counterparts are painting a picture of a dark and hopeless continent. African writers are fuelling the fire of cultural genocide in distorting the true picture of what African literature should entail. There is the need for more works which would celebrate rather than berate the continent.
        There is also the issue of generational gap. Each generation of African writers have brought its own set of ideologies, world views and how phenomena are interpreted. If Soyinka was to read a science fiction novel by Ayo Arigbabu, what would he think? If contemporary works by Africans contains less proverbs, does it make it any more less African? If we chose to dispel mysticism and superstition and replace masquerades with terrorists and bombs, does it make it a western imitation?
      Indeed the picture depicted shows the looming gap in identifying ourselves as a people. Until we Africans chose to takes a common stance on our identity, the split personality would continue. The present day African struggles to define himself, and depends on what others define him to be. This has reflected in our literature. Concisely put, if we are to define African literature successfully, let us start with ourselves first.

5 comments:

  1. How exactly do you want Africans to collectively take a common stance on their identity definition? Don't you think this will also run contrary to your last sentence; "Concisely put, if we are to define African literature successfully, let us start with ourselves first."? You are mixing collectivity with individuality...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with strong self. When I write fiction I'm not grappling with issues of identity or how to represent Africa. Contrary to your statement that 'the present day African struggles to define himself' that is not the case at all for me. I have never struggled to define myself.

    I write about subjects I am passionate about. The setting, characters & storyline are coloured by my experiences & view of the world.

    http://fresherangle.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Oluchi. African writers are supposed to speak truth to their experiences. It is the critics who interpret African writing in terms of alienation or issues of identity. Thus these are the tools we have been given over time.It is somewhat like a cliche when analyzing a piece to ask,"what loss is the author mourning?" "Is S/he torn between being an oyibo or an African?" and so forth. The reality is not that writers are constrained in imagination but that there is a responsibility that goes with the vocation to speak truth to reality. And that is what the real definition of African Literature should be.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thіs post is priceless. Whеn can I find оut moгe?


    Alѕo visіt my blog :: payday loans

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanκ you for any other magnificent post. The place elѕe could anyone
    get that type οf infοrmation іn ѕuch
    an ideal mеthod of ωriting? I hаve a presеntation subsеquent week, and I
    am on the search for such info.

    Feel fгeе to visit my pagе; Same Day Payday Loans

    ReplyDelete

Get widget